Josh Frydenberg’s road to recovery hinges on middle- and high-income Australians spending big
The government is relying on middle- and high-income earners and businesses to spend big and kick-start the economy.
The Morrison government is counting on the private sector and cashed-up workers to drive a surge of economic growth, fuelled by a half-trillion-dollar deficit binge that the government believes will return unemployment to 2019 levels by 2024.
In tonight’s budget for 2020-21, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has unveiled not merely a record deficit of $213.7 billion for the current year, but a series of astonishing deficits stretching into the mid-2020s: a monster $112 billion in 2021-22, $88 billion in 2022-23 and $68 billion in 2023-24.
The bill for taxpayers will be nearly half a trillion dollars, driving government net debt to nearly $1 trillion by 2023-24, or over 40% of GDP, and leaving government spending still at historic levels years from now.
However, the beneficiaries of the largesse will not be those most likely to spend it, or who need it the most, but middle- and high-income earners and businesses, whom the government hopes will spend up big to push economic growth above 4% next financial year and get unemployment back down below 6% by mid-decade.
Between the stage two tax cuts, brought forward to this financial year, and a 100% investment write-off for all but the very largest businesses, taxpayers will fork out nearly $45 billion over four years in the two biggest ticket items in a budget filled with unprecedented numbers.
But low-income earners and the unemployed receive little.
Low-income earners will get only half the tax cut that middle- and high-income earners receive, while the unemployed still face a New Year nightmare as JobSeeker payments revert to their below-poverty pre-COVID level at the end of the year.
The residential aged care sector has received some extra funding, but not the crucial expansion in support it needs.
The government has poured extra money into its under-pressure Home Care program, spending $1.6 billion on 23,000 more places, another $205 million to try to retain aged care workers in the sector, and some extra funding for the beleaguered Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission.
But residential care will continue under existing funding arrangements, with only some one-off COVID-related payments for assistance for providers.
Social housing investment — urged on the government by virtually every stakeholder for months — is also absent.
The government’s increase in infrastructure spending — notionally $9 billion, although the area is particularly subject to the government’s penchant for re-announcements — also lacks the kind of big-bang commitment that many were calling for to support the economy.
Instead, the government is hoping that bringing forward tax cuts for middle- and high-income earners will get Australians spending, in turn encouraging business to take advantage of generous tax incentives (including an ability to retrospectively claim back current losses, creating a tax rebate) and start investing and employing.
It’s not quite trickle-down economics, but it’s a massive debt-fuelled Keynesian investment in animal spirits intended to lift a struggling economy somewhere back to where it was before the pandemic hit.
If it ever does, we’ll still have a national debt that will take decades to pay off.
This article was first published by Crikey.
NOW READ: Budget 2020: $1.2 billion wage subsidy program for apprentices and trainees
NOW READ: Budget 2020: Here’s what nine startup founders really want from Frydenberg
