Shark Tank judge Steve Baxter has shed light on why so few businesses pass through the due diligence process after scoring deals on the popular reality TV show for entrepreneurs, pointing to both a lack of thoroughness and other motives for wanting to appear on the show.
Last month, Baxter told The Australian he spends around $300,000 a year to employ four full-time staff to work on completing due diligence for Shark Tank deals.
With his business based on investing, Baxter said not sealing the deals delivers โall the expenditure but no revenueโ.
โThatโs not something I want, but at the same time, Iโm not going to invest in stupid things,โ he told The Australian.
Recent Fairfax Media analysis revealed that of the 50 businesses that appeared on Shark Tank last season, 27 received offers of investment on television, yet just four investments actually went ahead.
Baxter said thereโs are a number of issues that stop deals from going ahead.
โSome of the things we see is some businesses literally donโt have a repeatable set of financial accounts,โ he said.
โThey donโt use software, or if they do itโs that poorly configured that when you run the same report twice you get a different answer. Which doesnโt fill you with confidence.โ
Baxter also revealed some entrepreneurs who appeared on the show werenโt even seeking a deal, but were more motivated by exposure.
โWe tell them โweโre happy to stay mum, just tell us, so we stop wasting each otherโs timeโ,โ he said.
โWeโll maintain the secret for you, weโll do that. It saves both time both ways. Itโs nothing that unusual.โ
NOW READ: Shark Tankโs Naomi Simson on the uncertain world of startup investing