The Coalition has returned to government at a time of uncertainty and rapid change in almost every area of energy policy.
With an energy policy released and a responsible minister named, what can we determine about where this new government is headed?
The Coalition’s formal policy tries to address some of Australia’s outstanding energy issues. Emphasis will be on national energy security, energy market transparency and roles of alternative transport fuels.
The policies are mostly quite specific. They target key existing issues and agendas: Resolving the coal seam methane controversy, developing infrastructure so interstate truck drivers can fill up with gas rather than diesel, selling uranium to India, and encouraging exploration and extraction of mineral resources.
The government proposes a new energy white paper within a year. This seems to be an alternative to announcing comprehensive policies. The previous government published a white paper only recently but there are strong grounds for revising this seriously deficient paper.
Changes to electricity and gas markets are long overdue. The recent Productivity Commission report on electricity can only be described as scathing. Lack of competition in gas markets seems to be driving uncertainty and unacceptably high prices, which will be exacerbated by export of gas from Queensland in coming years. The question is whether the policy focus will be on propping up the incumbent energy industries or supporting transformation.
Other proposals are outside the energy policy, but will affect the sector. There is a proposal to allow electricity from waste from native forest management to qualify under the Renewable Energy Target, decisions to focus on expanding road infrastructure but not rail, commitments for government to lead on e-service using the national broadband network, and cuts to a number of sustainable energy programs funded from carbon price revenue.
It is also interesting that in his new cabinet, Prime Minister Abbott has not appointed an energy minister. Former energy minister, and now industry minister, Ian Macfarlane will play this role. He may have his hands full.
The tone of the new government’s policy statement suggests that it wants to see increasing energy exports, stronger development and roll-out of alternative transport fuels. It also wants to review electricity and gas market models.
The focus on increasing exports seems to imply more coal, gas and uranium mining and export. But will there be sufficient demand and profitable prices on world markets?
The International Energy Agency, in its 2012 World Energy Outlook, estimated global demand for coal would decline by 30% by 2035. This is predicated on a scenario that limits atmospheric concentrations to 450 parts per million of CO2 equivalent.
China has recently taken steps to limit future demand for coal, while improving the economic efficiency of its own coal mines. Recent analysis suggests a peak in global coal demand for power generation by 2020.
Global uranium demand will be strongly influenced by the reactions to the Fukushima experience and the challenges of managing an ageing fleet of power stations. It will also depend on progress in renewable energy and energy efficiency; we may not need nuclear.
The picture for liquid natural gas exports may be rosier, but the situation is still challenging. Gas production is very capital intensive, and competition is increasing. Our Asian customers are increasingly critical of Australian pricing, compared to cheaper US prices.
The emergence of coal seam gas and shale gas development technologies also opens up new production possibilities around the world. The future level of demand for gas is also open to debate: it faces plenty of competition from other options.
Story continues on page 2. Please click below.
