Create a free account, or log in

How automation will hurt some parts of Australia more than others: CEDA future workforce report

Last week the Committee for Economic Development Australia (CEDA) issued a report detailing the future of the Australian workforce, in it there are important messages for businesses. While the discussion of the workforce of the future focuses, quite rightly, on the role of workers, how employers and businesses fit into a changed economy is important […]
Paul Wallbank
Paul Wallbank
How automation will hurt some parts of Australia more than others: CEDA future workforce report

Last week the Committee for Economic Development Australia (CEDA) issued a report detailing the future of the Australian workforce, in it there are important messages for businesses.

While the discussion of the workforce of the future focuses, quite rightly, on the role of workers, how employers and businesses fit into a changed economy is important as well.

For businesses, the future of work affects not just the staff they employ but also the markets they cater for as those workers are also their customers. This is even truer for small businesses catering to local markets.

 

Where the money is

 

The key thing from the report is that some communities are going to be more seriously affected by automation than others. The map of Australia that accompanied the CEDA report showing the likelihood of jobs being lost across the nation underscores that imbalance.

In those areas expecting large dislocation, business is about to get tougher as workers find their skills are no longer valuable in the face of automation.

Similarly, if local industries are becoming more automated then businesses servicing those industries are also going to need the skills to meet their customers’ more advanced needs.

 

Consumer facing risks

 

So small businesses in those districts of great disruption have to consider their markets; if they are consumer-facing then their customer base could be shrinking, while if they cater to other businesses then capital investment and finding skills in the new technologies are going to be required.

Even there, the picture is cloudy as upstream industries will be affected. A town that serves as an agricultural centre, for example, will see smarter farms using less labour.

In that town, those businesses servicing other businesses that serve local consumers will see their market getting thinner while those servicing the smarter farms and processors will need to buy new equipment and find workers with the skills to operate it.

This isn’t a new phenomenon, it describes what’s happened to rural communities around the developed world as farming became industrialised through the Twentieth Century and the process is continuing as combines become self-driving and automation replaces a lot of tasks currently done by labourers or manually operated machines.

 

Challenging the commuter belt

 

The question though is not just for rural enterprises, it applies for businesses everywhere as the workforce changes. It may well be the areas affected the most are commuter belt suburbs where white collar workers are displaced by artificial intelligence and algorithms creating problems for the local economy that’s based on servicing the needs of those middle-class households.

It’s difficult to say for sure and that’s why the CEDA measures are based upon probability. For business owners and managers though, they’ll need to watch shifts in their marketplaces closely and watch for the opportunities that will undoubtedly arise from a changing economy.

Paul Wallbank is the publisher of Networked Globe, his personal blog Decoding The New Economy charts how our society is changing in the connected century.